Manage Employees with MVC Forms
| Name | Gender | Age | State | Department | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Male | 32 | Arizona | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 44 | Washington | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 43 | Missouri | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 60 | Arkansas | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 52 | Georgia | IT | |
|
|
Female | 18 | North Carolina | IT | |
|
|
Male | 44 | Utah | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 62 | Virginia | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 52 | Wisconsin | IT | |
|
|
Female | 28 | South Carolina | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 29 | Nevada | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 51 | North Carolina | HR | |
|
|
Female | 47 | Illinois | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 25 | Kansas | IT | |
|
|
Male | 39 | Idaho | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 51 | West Virginia | HR | |
|
|
Male | 63 | Indiana | IT | |
|
|
Female | 49 | Alaska | IT | |
|
|
Female | 61 | Ohio | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 51 | Montana | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 46 | Rhode Island | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 19 | Utah | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 63 | Indiana | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 57 | New Hampshire | IT | |
|
|
Male | 69 | California | IT | |
|
|
Male | 41 | Alaska | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 45 | Indiana | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 44 | Kentucky | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 50 | Texas | HR | |
|
|
Female | 43 | Rhode Island | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 64 | Montana | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 48 | Alabama | IT | |
|
|
Male | 66 | Virginia | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 27 | North Carolina | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 63 | Iowa | HR | |
|
|
Male | 19 | Kentucky | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 42 | Missouri | HR | |
|
|
Male | 42 | Ohio | IT | |
|
|
Male | 31 | North Dakota | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 51 | North Dakota | IT | |
|
|
Female | 31 | Hawaii | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 68 | Pennsylvania | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 41 | Texas | HR | |
|
|
Male | 36 | New York | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 23 | Ohio | HR | |
|
|
Female | 22 | Louisiana | HR | |
|
|
Female | 41 | Michigan | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 22 | New Mexico | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 48 | Oklahoma | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 24 | Oregon | HR | |
|
|
Male | 34 | Delaware | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 20 | Massachusetts | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 47 | Rhode Island | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 45 | Arkansas | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 18 | Kansas | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 70 | Wyoming | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 35 | Iowa | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 39 | Arizona | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 34 | Oklahoma | HR | |
|
|
Female | 61 | Georgia | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 55 | Massachusetts | IT | |
|
|
Male | 42 | Montana | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 30 | Oklahoma | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 22 | New York | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 22 | Iowa | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 37 | Hawaii | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 46 | Oklahoma | HR | |
|
|
Male | 44 | Connecticut | HR | |
|
|
Female | 29 | Utah | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 68 | Georgia | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 57 | Alabama | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 64 | North Dakota | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 58 | South Dakota | HR | |
|
|
Female | 40 | Vermont | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 37 | Tennessee | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 31 | South Carolina | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 64 | Utah | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 58 | Idaho | IT | |
|
|
Male | 20 | Minnesota | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 42 | South Carolina | HR | |
|
|
Female | 31 | Vermont | HR | |
|
|
Female | 18 | Maine | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 41 | Maryland | HR | |
|
|
Female | 64 | Alabama | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 62 | Minnesota | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 27 | North Dakota | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 38 | Maryland | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 35 | Louisiana | IT | |
|
|
Female | 69 | Idaho | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 25 | New York | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 68 | Florida | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 35 | South Carolina | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 44 | Illinois | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 67 | California | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 50 | New York | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 32 | Missouri | HR | |
|
|
Male | 18 | Virginia | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 65 | New Hampshire | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 27 | Indiana | HR | |
|
|
Female | 56 | New York | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 21 | Missouri | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 22 | Colorado | IT | |
|
|
Male | 22 | Nebraska | HR | |
|
|
Female | 56 | New Jersey | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 38 | Nebraska | HR | |
|
|
Male | 28 | Ohio | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 57 | Oregon | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 54 | Rhode Island | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 31 | Massachusetts | HR | |
|
|
Male | 56 | Oklahoma | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 53 | Missouri | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 32 | Connecticut | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 41 | Wyoming | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 57 | Pennsylvania | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 29 | Arizona | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 66 | West Virginia | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 41 | Tennessee | HR | |
|
|
Female | 18 | Pennsylvania | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 38 | Mississippi | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 55 | Hawaii | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 27 | Idaho | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 44 | Ohio | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 33 | Washington | HR | |
|
|
Male | 51 | Michigan | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 67 | Kentucky | IT | |
|
|
Female | 39 | Missouri | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 56 | Oklahoma | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 45 | Kentucky | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 34 | Texas | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 64 | California | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 21 | Tennessee | IT | |
|
|
Male | 53 | Maine | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 29 | North Dakota | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 35 | Florida | IT | |
|
|
Male | 29 | Virginia | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 56 | Minnesota | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 70 | Wyoming | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 40 | Ohio | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 51 | Oregon | HR | |
|
|
Male | 50 | South Carolina | HR | |
|
|
Male | 47 | Maryland | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 31 | Minnesota | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 55 | Texas | IT | |
|
|
Male | 34 | Idaho | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 55 | Maryland | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 33 | Oklahoma | HR | |
|
|
Female | 53 | Illinois | IT | |
|
|
Female | 30 | Wyoming | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 47 | Florida | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 24 | Ohio | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 66 | Massachusetts | IT | |
|
|
Male | 43 | North Carolina | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 37 | Missouri | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 33 | Alabama | IT | |
|
|
Male | 40 | Massachusetts | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 33 | Vermont | HR | |
|
|
Female | 26 | New Hampshire | HR | |
|
|
Male | 60 | Pennsylvania | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 58 | Delaware | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 43 | Pennsylvania | HR | |
|
|
Female | 66 | Connecticut | IT | |
|
|
Female | 61 | West Virginia | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 47 | Texas | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 45 | New Jersey | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 26 | Texas | HR | |
|
|
Male | 43 | Arizona | HR | |
|
|
Female | 44 | North Dakota | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 57 | Nevada | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 50 | Rhode Island | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 63 | Connecticut | IT | |
|
|
Female | 53 | Iowa | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 46 | Kansas | HR | |
|
|
Male | 65 | Idaho | IT | |
|
|
Female | 48 | Utah | HR | |
|
|
Female | 30 | Oklahoma | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 68 | Kansas | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 59 | New Mexico | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 57 | Hawaii | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 54 | Kentucky | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 61 | Vermont | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 47 | Maryland | HR | |
|
|
Female | 21 | Idaho | IT | |
|
|
Male | 62 | Oklahoma | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 43 | Nevada | HR | |
|
|
Female | 37 | Minnesota | HR | |
|
|
Male | 66 | Arkansas | HR | |
|
|
Female | 53 | Utah | IT | |
|
|
Female | 49 | Washington | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 35 | Texas | IT | |
|
|
Male | 49 | Connecticut | IT | |
|
|
Male | 34 | Colorado | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 66 | West Virginia | IT | |
|
|
Female | 38 | North Carolina | HR | |
|
|
Male | 24 | Alaska | IT | |
|
|
Male | 36 | Kansas | IT | |
|
|
Female | 38 | Colorado | HR | |
|
|
Female | 51 | Alabama | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 29 | Illinois | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 50 | Connecticut | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 36 | Texas | IT | |
|
|
Female | 28 | New Jersey | IT | |
|
|
Female | 25 | Delaware | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 40 | Iowa | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 18 | Maine | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 70 | Florida | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 37 | Virginia | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 70 | South Carolina | HR | |
|
|
Male | 45 | Arizona | HR | |
|
|
Female | 70 | Nebraska | HR | |
|
|
Female | 26 | Missouri | HR | |
|
|
Female | 48 | West Virginia | IT | |
|
|
Female | 28 | Washington | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 41 | South Dakota | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 23 | Wisconsin | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 64 | Delaware | IT | |
|
|
Female | 48 | Wyoming | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 61 | Oregon | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 64 | Alaska | HR | |
|
|
Male | 34 | Arkansas | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 20 | Louisiana | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 33 | Idaho | IT | |
|
|
Male | 56 | New Mexico | HR | |
|
|
Female | 18 | Arizona | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 39 | Vermont | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 65 | Utah | HR | |
|
|
Female | 29 | Oregon | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 18 | Nevada | HR | |
|
|
Male | 21 | Washington | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 35 | New Hampshire | HR | |
|
|
Male | 35 | Vermont | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 40 | Rhode Island | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 33 | South Carolina | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 70 | Alaska | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 44 | Kentucky | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 43 | Idaho | IT | |
|
|
Female | 56 | Wyoming | IT | |
|
|
Male | 34 | Texas | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 45 | New York | IT | |
|
|
Male | 69 | Washington | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 57 | Massachusetts | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 30 | Indiana | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 48 | Indiana | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 24 | Illinois | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 58 | Georgia | HR | |
|
|
Male | 51 | California | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 38 | Iowa | HR | |
|
|
Female | 45 | Arkansas | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 26 | California | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 53 | Massachusetts | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 55 | California | IT | |
|
|
Female | 34 | Utah | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 45 | Kentucky | IT | |
|
|
Male | 41 | Montana | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 40 | Massachusetts | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 57 | Arizona | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 45 | Missouri | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 44 | Nebraska | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 18 | Georgia | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 43 | Wyoming | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 58 | New Hampshire | IT | |
|
|
Male | 70 | Kansas | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 25 | South Carolina | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 61 | Hawaii | Marketing | |
|
|
Male | 63 | Texas | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 39 | Indiana | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 40 | Kansas | HR | |
|
|
Female | 49 | Arkansas | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 22 | Kentucky | IT | |
|
|
Female | 42 | Illinois | Operations | |
|
|
Female | 27 | New Jersey | IT | |
|
|
Female | 34 | Vermont | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 60 | Mississippi | HR | |
|
|
Female | 20 | Rhode Island | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 45 | Oregon | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 32 | Mississippi | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 26 | Virginia | IT | |
|
|
Male | 24 | New Mexico | IT | |
|
|
Male | 34 | Rhode Island | Accounting | |
|
|
Male | 49 | New Jersey | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 64 | New York | HR | |
|
|
Female | 18 | Indiana | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 62 | New Hampshire | IT | |
|
|
Male | 60 | Rhode Island | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 33 | Washington | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 40 | Virginia | HR | |
|
|
Female | 19 | Alabama | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 23 | Ohio | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 55 | Colorado | IT | |
|
|
Male | 18 | Washington | HR | |
|
|
Male | 47 | Nevada | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 69 | Wyoming | Executive | |
|
|
Female | 58 | Arkansas | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 27 | Connecticut | HR | |
|
|
Male | 24 | Utah | Operations | |
|
|
Male | 51 | Alabama | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 61 | Ohio | Executive | |
|
|
Male | 59 | New York | Accounting | |
|
|
Female | 64 | Nevada | Marketing | |
|
|
Female | 39 | Texas | Executive |
MVC Forms Approach in ASP.NET MVC
The MVC Forms approach allows developers to build applications with strong separation of concerns, making it easier to maintain and scale. It supports robust form handling and validation mechanisms, enabling secure and efficient data entry and modification.
Best Practices for MVC Forms:
- Utilize
[HttpGet]and[HttpPost]attributes for appropriate routing and data handling. - Implement validation using Data Annotations or custom validation logic.
- Use
to prevent CSRF attacks.
Pros and Cons of MVC Forms Approach:
- Pros: Clear separation of concerns, easy to test, comprehensive model binding and validation support.
- Cons: Can become complex with large forms, requires knowledge of HTML helpers and model binding.
Microsoft continues to support the MVC architecture, providing ongoing updates and improvements. With .NET 8, ASP.NET MVC remains a reliable choice for building web applications with a clean, maintainable architecture.
CRUD Functionality in MVC
In classic MVC architecture, CRUD operations are implemented using Controller actions and views for each activity: Create, Read, Update, and Delete. The Create action uses a form to capture new employee data, which is saved to the database upon submission. The Read action displays a list of employees retrieved from the database, as seen in the table above. Update allows editing of an employee's details, while Delete provides a confirmation before removal.
You can generate views for each CRUD operation directly from your Entity Framework entities using scaffolding tools. This automates the process of creating views and wiring up the controller. However, it is best practice to use ViewModels rather than exposing your entities directly to the view, ensuring better separation of concerns and security.