Employee Management with Razor Pages
Manage your employee records with tightly bound UI and backend code using Razor Pages in ASP.NET Core.
| Name | Gender | Age | State | Country | Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Male | 35 | Texas | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 45 | New York | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 55 | Colorado | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 65 | Idaho | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 55 | California | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 35 | Florida | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 50 | Texas | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 53 | Massachusetts | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 50 | New York | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 42 | Illinois | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 52 | Alabama | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 37 | Ohio | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 34 | North Carolina | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 67 | Illinois | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 64 | Maryland | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 64 | New Mexico | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 56 | Colorado | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 57 | Iowa | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 43 | West Virginia | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 68 | Nevada | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 18 | Nebraska | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 27 | Michigan | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 23 | Alaska | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 32 | Connecticut | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 46 | Missouri | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 48 | Indiana | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 23 | Texas | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 43 | Florida | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 49 | Illinois | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 19 | Virginia | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 53 | New Mexico | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 21 | Missouri | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 64 | Oklahoma | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 63 | Wisconsin | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 53 | Florida | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 70 | Louisiana | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 62 | Michigan | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 35 | Missouri | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 61 | Illinois | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 70 | Indiana | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 63 | Kentucky | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 66 | Missouri | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 36 | Missouri | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 35 | Tennessee | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 50 | Alaska | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 54 | Louisiana | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 70 | Maryland | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 21 | Minnesota | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 29 | Ohio | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 51 | South Dakota | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 59 | New Jersey | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 27 | Ohio | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 49 | Iowa | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 23 | Kansas | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 57 | Hawaii | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 51 | Wisconsin | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 28 | Texas | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 59 | Utah | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 41 | Iowa | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 66 | Mississippi | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 18 | Nebraska | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 27 | Washington | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 43 | Delaware | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 41 | Alabama | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 28 | New Mexico | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 55 | Colorado | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 48 | Oregon | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 24 | Alabama | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 47 | Nevada | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 29 | South Dakota | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 62 | North Dakota | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 47 | New Hampshire | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 31 | Montana | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 67 | Delaware | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 20 | Arkansas | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 22 | North Carolina | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 24 | Maryland | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 70 | Washington | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 18 | Tennessee | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 66 | Oklahoma | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 28 | South Dakota | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 34 | Alaska | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 54 | Arkansas | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 61 | Indiana | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 68 | New Mexico | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 49 | West Virginia | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 21 | North Carolina | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 48 | South Dakota | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 67 | Iowa | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 51 | Pennsylvania | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 31 | Utah | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 33 | Michigan | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 27 | Alabama | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 40 | Arizona | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 64 | California | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 51 | Massachusetts | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 24 | Pennsylvania | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 51 | Colorado | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 35 | New Mexico | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 56 | North Carolina | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 39 | Arkansas | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 23 | Alaska | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 21 | Arkansas | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 25 | Wyoming | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 26 | California | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 67 | Utah | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 18 | Virginia | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 34 | Louisiana | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 27 | North Dakota | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 23 | Iowa | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 25 | Iowa | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 62 | Oklahoma | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 55 | Iowa | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 30 | Louisiana | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 70 | Virginia | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 24 | Oregon | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 70 | Wisconsin | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 27 | Rhode Island | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 36 | California | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 50 | Hawaii | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 49 | Virginia | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 40 | South Dakota | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 28 | Florida | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 37 | Oregon | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 34 | West Virginia | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 64 | New Hampshire | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 48 | North Carolina | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 49 | Utah | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 62 | Iowa | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 52 | Colorado | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 66 | Colorado | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 66 | California | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 56 | Tennessee | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 49 | Utah | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 48 | South Dakota | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 62 | Alaska | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 43 | Iowa | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 23 | Wyoming | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 49 | Massachusetts | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 19 | Arizona | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 38 | South Dakota | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 19 | Utah | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 47 | Illinois | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 58 | Texas | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 26 | Colorado | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 64 | Alaska | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 65 | New Mexico | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 27 | Mississippi | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 29 | South Dakota | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 26 | Kentucky | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 18 | South Carolina | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 26 | Vermont | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 31 | New Mexico | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 48 | Minnesota | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 52 | Missouri | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 35 | Wisconsin | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 48 | Arizona | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 31 | Pennsylvania | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 52 | Indiana | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 31 | Delaware | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 59 | West Virginia | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 42 | Montana | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 54 | Mississippi | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 70 | Wisconsin | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 42 | South Dakota | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 70 | Louisiana | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 65 | Florida | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 37 | Maryland | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 57 | Georgia | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 31 | Maine | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 50 | Rhode Island | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 70 | Indiana | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 27 | Iowa | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 53 | Vermont | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 63 | New Mexico | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 31 | Georgia | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 61 | Massachusetts | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 62 | Pennsylvania | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 64 | California | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 26 | Montana | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 70 | West Virginia | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 27 | Minnesota | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 61 | Michigan | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 29 | Louisiana | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 63 | Minnesota | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 64 | Louisiana | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 25 | Indiana | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 62 | Minnesota | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 30 | Georgia | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 23 | South Carolina | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 22 | Michigan | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 41 | California | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 68 | New Mexico | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 50 | Indiana | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 44 | New Jersey | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 26 | Colorado | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 34 | South Dakota | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 45 | Kansas | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 20 | Alabama | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 49 | Iowa | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 48 | Vermont | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 32 | Montana | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 67 | Rhode Island | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 33 | Arizona | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 28 | Illinois | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 47 | New York | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 67 | New Mexico | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 20 | Nevada | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 50 | West Virginia | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 70 | Connecticut | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 40 | Idaho | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 59 | Massachusetts | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 42 | South Dakota | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 63 | New York | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 30 | West Virginia | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 50 | Kentucky | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 31 | California | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 70 | Arkansas | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 50 | Virginia | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 51 | Alabama | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 20 | Arkansas | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 25 | Rhode Island | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 42 | Nevada | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 41 | Louisiana | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 66 | Alabama | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 68 | Colorado | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 23 | Kansas | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 30 | Alabama | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 25 | New York | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 27 | South Carolina | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 35 | Idaho | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 19 | Rhode Island | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 25 | South Dakota | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 25 | Kentucky | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 40 | Arizona | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 26 | West Virginia | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 57 | California | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 42 | Iowa | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 39 | Nebraska | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 21 | New York | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 70 | Nevada | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 33 | Arkansas | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 60 | New Mexico | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 58 | Tennessee | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 49 | Kentucky | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 45 | Montana | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 56 | Nebraska | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 55 | South Carolina | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 53 | Delaware | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 24 | Nebraska | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 60 | Indiana | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 42 | Vermont | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 45 | Pennsylvania | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 37 | Alaska | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 51 | Florida | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 39 | Maryland | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 55 | Maine | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 47 | South Carolina | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 35 | Virginia | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 66 | Louisiana | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 42 | Rhode Island | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 52 | Arizona | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 22 | Michigan | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 69 | Mississippi | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 44 | Maryland | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 34 | Tennessee | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 37 | Wyoming | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 42 | Rhode Island | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 59 | Arkansas | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 57 | Vermont | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 40 | Nebraska | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 29 | Maine | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 64 | New York | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 38 | Maryland | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 68 | Indiana | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 50 | North Carolina | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 70 | Wisconsin | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 22 | North Dakota | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 26 | Rhode Island | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 60 | South Dakota | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 33 | Hawaii | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 33 | South Dakota | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 37 | New Jersey | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 54 | New Hampshire | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 57 | Alabama | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 63 | Nebraska | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 42 | Kansas | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 41 | Washington | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 60 | Texas | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 45 | North Carolina | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 19 | Maine | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 23 | Rhode Island | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 70 | Iowa | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 21 | New Jersey | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 23 | Maine | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 53 | New Mexico | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 24 | Alabama | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 55 | New Mexico | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 61 | Mississippi | USA | Operations |
How Razor Pages Work
Razor Pages provide a simpler, page-focused approach for building web applications in ASP.NET Core. Unlike MVC, where the controller is separate, Razor Pages combine the view and the code-behind logic in a single file. This tightly bound UI and backend logic makes it easier to maintain and understand, especially for CRUD operations.
History of Razor Pages
Introduced in ASP.NET Core 2.0, Razor Pages were designed to simplify the development process by reducing the number of files required for simple pages. They are an evolution of the Web Pages framework and provide an easy way to create page-centric applications.
Best Practices for Razor Pages
- Use ViewModels: Separate ViewModels from entities to avoid exposing database logic directly to the UI.
- Keep Code-Behind Clean: Maintain a clear separation of concerns by keeping business logic out of the code-behind.
- Leverage Tag Helpers: Utilize Tag Helpers for cleaner and more readable Razor markup.
Pros and Cons of Razor Pages
- Pros: Simplifies development, tightly binds UI and backend, easy to learn and use for simple scenarios.
- Cons: Limited for complex applications compared to MVC, less control over the routing and structure of the application.