Employee Management with Razor Pages
Manage your employee records with tightly bound UI and backend code using Razor Pages in ASP.NET Core.
| Name | Gender | Age | State | Country | Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Male | 35 | Texas | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 45 | New York | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 55 | Colorado | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 65 | Idaho | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 55 | California | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 35 | Florida | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 50 | Texas | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 53 | Massachusetts | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 50 | New York | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 21 | New Hampshire | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 31 | Tennessee | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 43 | New Hampshire | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 23 | Wisconsin | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 32 | Kentucky | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 51 | Massachusetts | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 29 | Utah | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 70 | Connecticut | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 37 | New Jersey | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 58 | Wisconsin | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 69 | Oregon | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 53 | North Dakota | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 45 | New York | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 23 | Oklahoma | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 67 | Texas | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 29 | Mississippi | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 30 | Georgia | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 31 | New Hampshire | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 64 | South Carolina | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 38 | North Dakota | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 19 | Virginia | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 52 | Montana | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 26 | Wyoming | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 34 | Maryland | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 58 | Indiana | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 25 | New Jersey | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 24 | Nevada | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 51 | Maryland | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 58 | South Dakota | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 20 | New Jersey | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 47 | Oregon | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 39 | Missouri | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 50 | North Dakota | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 47 | Delaware | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 59 | Kentucky | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 54 | Wisconsin | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 40 | Indiana | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 60 | South Carolina | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 54 | Rhode Island | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 35 | Connecticut | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 31 | Virginia | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 60 | Oregon | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 23 | Louisiana | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 38 | Louisiana | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 67 | Connecticut | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 59 | Alaska | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 41 | Louisiana | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 36 | Alaska | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 35 | Kansas | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 26 | Illinois | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 19 | California | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 54 | New Hampshire | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 29 | Colorado | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 29 | New Hampshire | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 52 | Massachusetts | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 21 | South Dakota | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 58 | Virginia | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 27 | Indiana | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 24 | Maryland | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 33 | Idaho | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 55 | New Mexico | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 40 | Minnesota | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 32 | Missouri | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 44 | Rhode Island | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 34 | Virginia | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 21 | Mississippi | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 45 | Vermont | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 42 | Connecticut | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 36 | Pennsylvania | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 31 | Indiana | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 23 | South Carolina | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 18 | Oklahoma | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 63 | Hawaii | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 58 | Florida | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 40 | Maryland | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 51 | Maryland | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 18 | Delaware | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 32 | South Dakota | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 55 | Ohio | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 64 | Michigan | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 25 | Alaska | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 46 | Virginia | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 31 | Delaware | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 18 | North Carolina | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 32 | Colorado | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 43 | Delaware | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 67 | Colorado | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 26 | Kansas | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 39 | Maine | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 27 | Pennsylvania | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 34 | Florida | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 54 | New York | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 50 | South Carolina | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 32 | Mississippi | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 30 | Missouri | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 45 | Arizona | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 61 | Minnesota | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 58 | Rhode Island | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 36 | South Dakota | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 39 | Alaska | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 56 | California | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 31 | Virginia | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 42 | Nevada | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 36 | Delaware | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 43 | North Dakota | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 58 | Idaho | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 51 | Nevada | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 47 | Maryland | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 25 | Missouri | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 70 | Kentucky | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 44 | Minnesota | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 51 | Oregon | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 34 | New Mexico | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 22 | Wyoming | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 19 | Illinois | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 57 | Nebraska | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 20 | North Carolina | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 29 | Kansas | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 59 | Missouri | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 26 | Idaho | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 18 | Utah | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 46 | Idaho | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 62 | Delaware | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 49 | Oklahoma | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 23 | Kansas | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 69 | Georgia | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 53 | Montana | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 46 | North Carolina | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 32 | Rhode Island | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 47 | Arkansas | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 34 | North Carolina | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 30 | Mississippi | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 27 | Hawaii | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 70 | Alabama | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 69 | South Dakota | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 36 | New Mexico | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 46 | Arkansas | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 31 | North Dakota | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 31 | Idaho | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 64 | Virginia | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 61 | Indiana | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 28 | Arizona | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 55 | Wisconsin | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 61 | Florida | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 39 | Michigan | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 67 | Vermont | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 36 | Colorado | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 41 | Ohio | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 27 | Arizona | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 37 | Maryland | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 36 | Louisiana | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 34 | New Hampshire | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 40 | Kentucky | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 22 | Connecticut | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 33 | Hawaii | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 64 | Wisconsin | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 53 | Montana | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 62 | Oregon | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 54 | West Virginia | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 69 | Wisconsin | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 32 | Virginia | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 41 | Virginia | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 38 | Pennsylvania | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 50 | Delaware | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 67 | Alabama | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 31 | Wyoming | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 24 | Hawaii | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 67 | Hawaii | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 29 | Georgia | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 48 | Maine | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 23 | North Carolina | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 56 | Rhode Island | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 18 | North Dakota | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 24 | Iowa | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 21 | Alabama | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 54 | Michigan | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 30 | Wisconsin | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 57 | Kentucky | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 66 | Illinois | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 29 | Oregon | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 34 | South Carolina | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 51 | Connecticut | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 41 | Virginia | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 66 | Arkansas | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 64 | Washington | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 50 | Georgia | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 70 | Iowa | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 30 | South Carolina | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 35 | Connecticut | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 64 | North Carolina | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 29 | Oregon | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 20 | Pennsylvania | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 38 | Pennsylvania | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 55 | Oklahoma | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 62 | Hawaii | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 33 | Illinois | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 56 | Texas | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 68 | Virginia | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 50 | New Mexico | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 63 | North Carolina | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 57 | Hawaii | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 63 | Nebraska | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 66 | Vermont | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 45 | Alaska | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 29 | Iowa | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 22 | Texas | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 52 | Wisconsin | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 54 | Indiana | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 22 | Texas | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 39 | Iowa | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 64 | Mississippi | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 23 | West Virginia | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 62 | Louisiana | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 21 | Iowa | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 36 | New York | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 62 | Illinois | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 67 | South Carolina | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 60 | South Carolina | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 58 | Maine | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 70 | Maine | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 45 | Massachusetts | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 45 | Louisiana | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 69 | Colorado | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 59 | Kentucky | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 64 | Maine | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 21 | Arizona | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 54 | Nevada | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 58 | Tennessee | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 60 | Pennsylvania | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 52 | Louisiana | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 18 | Illinois | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 67 | Missouri | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 46 | Minnesota | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 54 | New Hampshire | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 56 | Florida | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 60 | Mississippi | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 65 | Nevada | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 46 | Utah | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 30 | Minnesota | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 66 | Arizona | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 24 | New Hampshire | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 55 | Maryland | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 51 | Virginia | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 34 | Ohio | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 22 | West Virginia | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 28 | North Dakota | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 53 | Arizona | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 41 | Texas | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Female | 67 | Montana | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 26 | Iowa | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 68 | New Hampshire | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 23 | Arizona | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 36 | South Dakota | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Male | 35 | Kentucky | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 69 | Georgia | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 45 | Kentucky | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 22 | Virginia | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 53 | Arkansas | USA | Operations |
|
|
Female | 31 | Missouri | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 59 | Delaware | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 56 | Indiana | USA | Executive |
|
|
Female | 21 | Mississippi | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 46 | Rhode Island | USA | HR |
|
|
Female | 29 | Arkansas | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 54 | Rhode Island | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 68 | Maine | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 42 | Virginia | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 25 | Pennsylvania | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 42 | New York | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 35 | Louisiana | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 43 | New York | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 44 | Nevada | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 46 | New Mexico | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 28 | Illinois | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 23 | New Mexico | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 68 | West Virginia | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 58 | Connecticut | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 43 | Kentucky | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 70 | South Carolina | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 56 | Kentucky | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 20 | West Virginia | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 23 | Michigan | USA | IT |
|
|
Male | 36 | California | USA | Accounting |
|
|
Female | 28 | Tennessee | USA | HR |
|
|
Male | 37 | Pennsylvania | USA | IT |
|
|
Female | 65 | Mississippi | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 48 | Alaska | USA | Marketing |
|
|
Male | 45 | Ohio | USA | Executive |
|
|
Male | 61 | Vermont | USA | Operations |
|
|
Male | 66 | Kentucky | USA | Marketing |
How Razor Pages Work
Razor Pages provide a simpler, page-focused approach for building web applications in ASP.NET Core. Unlike MVC, where the controller is separate, Razor Pages combine the view and the code-behind logic in a single file. This tightly bound UI and backend logic makes it easier to maintain and understand, especially for CRUD operations.
History of Razor Pages
Introduced in ASP.NET Core 2.0, Razor Pages were designed to simplify the development process by reducing the number of files required for simple pages. They are an evolution of the Web Pages framework and provide an easy way to create page-centric applications.
Best Practices for Razor Pages
- Use ViewModels: Separate ViewModels from entities to avoid exposing database logic directly to the UI.
- Keep Code-Behind Clean: Maintain a clear separation of concerns by keeping business logic out of the code-behind.
- Leverage Tag Helpers: Utilize Tag Helpers for cleaner and more readable Razor markup.
Pros and Cons of Razor Pages
- Pros: Simplifies development, tightly binds UI and backend, easy to learn and use for simple scenarios.
- Cons: Limited for complex applications compared to MVC, less control over the routing and structure of the application.